Summary of The Cost Of Replicability in Active Learning, by Rupkatha Hira et al.
The Cost of Replicability in Active Learning
by Rupkatha Hira, Dominik Kau, Jessica Sorrell
First submitted to arxiv on: 12 Dec 2024
Categories
- Main: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
- Secondary: None
GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries
GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!
| Summary difficulty | Written by | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| High | Paper authors | High Difficulty Summary Read the original abstract here |
| Medium | GrooveSquid.com (original content) | Medium Difficulty Summary In this study, researchers investigate the impact of ensuring replicable results on active learning algorithms that reduce labeled data requirements. They focus on the CAL algorithm, a popular disagreement-based method, and modify it to integrate replicable statistical queries and random thresholding techniques. Theoretical analysis shows that while replicability increases label complexity, the modified CAL algorithm can still achieve significant efficiency gains even with this constraint. |
| Low | GrooveSquid.com (original content) | Low Difficulty Summary The researchers behind this study are trying to make machine learning models more reliable by making sure they produce the same results every time. They do this by looking at how a popular active learning method called CAL works and modifying it to be more consistent. By doing this, they show that you can still get good results even if you have to use more labeled data. |
Keywords
» Artificial intelligence » Active learning » Machine learning
