Loading Now

Summary of Talking the Talk Does Not Entail Walking the Walk: on the Limits Of Large Language Models in Lexical Entailment Recognition, by Candida M. Greco et al.


Talking the Talk Does Not Entail Walking the Walk: On the Limits of Large Language Models in Lexical Entailment Recognition

by Candida M. Greco, Lucio La Cava, Andrea Tagarelli

First submitted to arxiv on: 21 Jun 2024

Categories

  • Main: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
  • Secondary: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph)

     Abstract of paper      PDF of paper


GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries

GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!

Summary difficulty Written by Summary
High Paper authors High Difficulty Summary
Read the original abstract here
Medium GrooveSquid.com (original content) Medium Difficulty Summary
The paper investigates the capabilities of eight Large Language Models (LLMs) in recognizing lexical entailment relations among verbs through differently devised prompting strategies and zero-/few-shot settings. The models are tested over verb pairs from two lexical databases, WordNet and HyperLex. The findings show that LLMs can tackle the task with moderately good performance, but at varying levels of effectiveness under different conditions. Few-shot prompting is found to enhance model performance.
Low GrooveSquid.com (original content) Low Difficulty Summary
The paper looks at how well large language models can understand relationships between verbs in sentences. It uses two databases and tests different ways of asking the models to recognize these relationships. The results show that while the models are pretty good, they’re not perfect and still have room for improvement.

Keywords

* Artificial intelligence  * Few shot  * Prompting