Summary of Taking Training Seriously: Human Guidance and Management-based Regulation Of Artificial Intelligence, by Cary Coglianese and Colton R. Crum
Taking Training Seriously: Human Guidance and Management-Based Regulation of Artificial Intelligence
by Cary Coglianese, Colton R. Crum
First submitted to arxiv on: 13 Feb 2024
Categories
- Main: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
- Secondary: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries
GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!
Summary difficulty | Written by | Summary |
---|---|---|
High | Paper authors | High Difficulty Summary Read the original abstract here |
Medium | GrooveSquid.com (original content) | Medium Difficulty Summary The paper presents a management-based approach to regulating artificial intelligence (AI), which has gained popularity globally due to concerns about AI-related harms. This approach emphasizes human oversight during the development and training of AI tools. The authors argue that refinements in human-guided training techniques are necessary to align with this emerging regulatory paradigm. They highlight the benefits of human-guided training, including improved AI performance, fairness, and explainability. The paper discusses the connection between management-based regulatory frameworks and the need for human oversight during training. |
Low | GrooveSquid.com (original content) | Low Difficulty Summary AI is getting a bad rap because it’s not being governed well. To fix this, people are proposing a new way to regulate AI called “management-based.” This means humans will have more control over how AI tools are developed and trained. The authors think that making AI training more human-led will make AI better, fairer, and easier to understand. |