Loading Now

Summary of Solving Hidden Monotone Variational Inequalities with Surrogate Losses, by Ryan D’orazio et al.


Solving Hidden Monotone Variational Inequalities with Surrogate Losses

by Ryan D’Orazio, Danilo Vucetic, Zichu Liu, Junhyung Lyle Kim, Ioannis Mitliagkas, Gauthier Gidel

First submitted to arxiv on: 7 Nov 2024

Categories

  • Main: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
  • Secondary: Optimization and Control (math.OC)

     Abstract of paper      PDF of paper


GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries

GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!

Summary difficulty Written by Summary
High Paper authors High Difficulty Summary
Read the original abstract here
Medium GrooveSquid.com (original content) Medium Difficulty Summary
The proposed surrogate-based approach is a principled method for solving variational inequality (VI) problems using deep learning. By leveraging assumptions about hidden monotone structure, interpolation, and sufficient optimization of surrogates, the approach guarantees convergence while providing a unifying perspective on existing methods. The method is compatible with existing deep learning optimizers like ADAM and demonstrates effectiveness in min-max optimization and minimizing projected Bellman error. Additionally, a novel variant of TD(0) is proposed for deep reinforcement learning, which is more compute and sample efficient.
Low GrooveSquid.com (original content) Low Difficulty Summary
The paper proposes a new way to solve complex problems using deep learning. It shows that by making some assumptions about the problem, we can use existing deep learning tools to find solutions. This approach is useful because it guarantees that the solution will be correct and provides a clear understanding of how different methods work together. The authors also tested their method on specific problems and found that it works well.

Keywords

* Artificial intelligence  * Deep learning  * Optimization  * Reinforcement learning