Summary of Responsibility in a Multi-value Strategic Setting, by Timothy Parker et al.
Responsibility in a Multi-Value Strategic Setting
by Timothy Parker, Umberto Grandi, Emiliano Lorini
First submitted to arxiv on: 22 Oct 2024
Categories
- Main: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
- Secondary: None
GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries
GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!
| Summary difficulty | Written by | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| High | Paper authors | High Difficulty Summary Read the original abstract here |
| Medium | GrooveSquid.com (original content) | Medium Difficulty Summary This paper presents a novel model for responsibility attribution in multi-agent systems with multiple outcomes, expanding previous work which only considered single outcomes. The proposed model allows for the anticipation of responsibility, enabling agents to select strategies aligned with their values and minimizing their expected degree of responsibility. This approach is demonstrated to reliably minimize regret-minimizing strategies. |
| Low | GrooveSquid.com (original content) | Low Difficulty Summary This paper helps us create safer, more ethical AI by figuring out who’s responsible when many agents work together towards different goals. The researchers created a new way to assign responsibility in situations where multiple outcomes are possible, and also showed how thinking about responsibility ahead of time can help agents make better choices that match their values. |
