Summary of Online Experimental Design with Estimation-regret Trade-off Under Network Interference, by Zhiheng Zhang et al.
Online Experimental Design With Estimation-Regret Trade-off Under Network Interference
by Zhiheng Zhang, Zichen Wang
First submitted to arxiv on: 4 Dec 2024
Categories
- Main: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
- Secondary: Optimization and Control (math.OC); Statistics Theory (math.ST)
GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries
GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!
Summary difficulty | Written by | Summary |
---|---|---|
High | Paper authors | High Difficulty Summary Read the original abstract here |
Medium | GrooveSquid.com (original content) | Medium Difficulty Summary A unified framework for online experimental design is proposed to estimate interference-aware causal effects in networked environments. Traditional methods assume independent treatment effects among individuals, which may not hold in these settings. To address this issue, the authors introduce a novel approach that utilizes exposure mapping to represent treatment effects in a more flexible and context-aware manner. The framework achieves a Pareto-optimal trade-off between estimation accuracy and regret under different network topologies and time periods. Algorithmic implementation is also discussed. |
Low | GrooveSquid.com (original content) | Low Difficulty Summary In this paper, researchers tackle the challenge of estimating causal effects in networks where one person’s treatment can affect others. They introduce a new way to design online experiments that takes into account these network effects. This approach uses a concept called exposure mapping to represent how treatments affect different people in the network. The results show that this method is better than previous methods at balancing accuracy and regret. |