Loading Now

Summary of Noise Misleads Rotation Invariant Algorithms on Sparse Targets, by Manfred K. Warmuth (1) et al.


Noise misleads rotation invariant algorithms on sparse targets

by Manfred K. Warmuth, Wojciech Kotłowski, Matt Jones, Ehsan Amid

First submitted to arxiv on: 5 Mar 2024

Categories

  • Main: Machine Learning (stat.ML)
  • Secondary: Machine Learning (cs.LG)

     Abstract of paper      PDF of paper


GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries

GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!

Summary difficulty Written by Summary
High Paper authors High Difficulty Summary
Read the original abstract here
Medium GrooveSquid.com (original content) Medium Difficulty Summary
This paper explores the limitations of rotation invariant algorithms, particularly in learning sparse linear problems when the number of examples is below the “dimension” of the problem. The study focuses on gradient descent-trained neural networks with fully-connected input layers initialized with rotationally symmetric distributions. The authors show that even for simple sparse problems, such as learning a single feature out of d features, the classification error or regression loss grows with 1-k/n, where k is the number of examples seen. This lower bound becomes vacuous when the number of examples reaches the dimension.
Low GrooveSquid.com (original content) Low Difficulty Summary
This paper looks at how well certain algorithms do when they’re not very good at recognizing patterns that change direction. These algorithms, called rotation invariant, are used in neural networks and can be initialized with random values that look like circles. The researchers found that even for simple problems where we’re trying to learn one important feature out of many, these algorithms don’t get much better as they see more examples. This is a problem because it means these algorithms won’t be very good at recognizing patterns in real-world data.

Keywords

* Artificial intelligence  * Classification  * Gradient descent  * Regression