Loading Now

Summary of Logical Specifications-guided Dynamic Task Sampling For Reinforcement Learning Agents, by Yash Shukla et al.


Logical Specifications-guided Dynamic Task Sampling for Reinforcement Learning Agents

by Yash Shukla, Tanushree Burman, Abhishek Kulkarni, Robert Wright, Alvaro Velasquez, Jivko Sinapov

First submitted to arxiv on: 6 Feb 2024

Categories

  • Main: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
  • Secondary: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Robotics (cs.RO)

     Abstract of paper      PDF of paper


GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries

GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!

Summary difficulty Written by Summary
High Paper authors High Difficulty Summary
Read the original abstract here
Medium GrooveSquid.com (original content) Medium Difficulty Summary
The proposed Logical Specifications-guided Dynamic Task Sampling (LSTS) approach learns a set of reinforcement learning (RL) policies to guide an agent from an initial state to a goal state based on high-level task specifications. Unlike previous work, LSTS does not assume information about the environment dynamics or Reward Machines, and dynamically samples promising tasks that lead to successful goal policies. The method is evaluated on gridworlds, partially observable robotic tasks, and continuous control robotic manipulation tasks, achieving improved time-to-threshold performance compared to state-of-the-art baselines such as Q-Learning for Reward Machines (RM) and Compositional RL from logical Specifications (DIRL).
Low GrooveSquid.com (original content) Low Difficulty Summary
This paper helps artificial agents learn new behaviors using a special kind of guidance. Think of it like a roadmap that tells the agent how to get from one place to another. The old way of doing this required a lot of interactions with the environment, but this new approach is more efficient and gets better results. It works by breaking down big tasks into smaller ones and picking the most promising path to follow.

Keywords

* Artificial intelligence  * Reinforcement learning