Summary of Handling Irresolvable Conflicts in the Semantic Web: An Rdf-based Conflict-tolerant Version Of the Deontic Traditional Scheme, by Livio Robaldo and Gianluca Pozzato
Handling irresolvable conflicts in the Semantic Web: an RDF-based conflict-tolerant version of the Deontic Traditional Scheme
by Livio Robaldo, Gianluca Pozzato
First submitted to arxiv on: 29 Nov 2024
Categories
- Main: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
- Secondary: None
GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries
GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!
| Summary difficulty | Written by | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| High | Paper authors | High Difficulty Summary Read the original abstract here |
| Medium | GrooveSquid.com (original content) | Medium Difficulty Summary This paper presents a novel ontology that implements the Deontic Traditional Scheme in RDFs and SPARQL, designed to handle irresolvable conflicts. The framework is encoded in RDF, a widely used knowledge representation language, and formalizes all deontic modalities defined in the scheme. The ontology offers constructs to model and reason with various types of irresolvable conflicts, violations, and the interaction between deontic modalities and contextual constraints. This approach marks a significant advancement in standard theoretical research in formal Deontic Logic, addressing aspects not previously covered in a unified framework. |
| Low | GrooveSquid.com (original content) | Low Difficulty Summary This paper creates a new way to understand rules and how they conflict with each other. It uses special language (RDFs and SPARQL) that helps computers talk about rules and make decisions based on them. The new system can handle situations where two or more rules say opposite things, but none of them is stronger than the others. This is important because it will help create better artificial intelligence systems. |
