Summary of Global-liar: Factuality Of Llms Over Time and Geographic Regions, by Shujaat Mirza et al.
Global-Liar: Factuality of LLMs over Time and Geographic Regions
by Shujaat Mirza, Bruno Coelho, Yuyuan Cui, Christina Pöpper, Damon McCoy
First submitted to arxiv on: 31 Jan 2024
Categories
- Main: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
- Secondary: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Information Retrieval (cs.IR)
GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries
GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!
Summary difficulty | Written by | Summary |
---|---|---|
High | Paper authors | High Difficulty Summary Read the original abstract here |
Medium | GrooveSquid.com (original content) | Medium Difficulty Summary The paper investigates the factuality and fairness of Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 in retrieving information online. It evaluates their factual accuracy, stability, and biases, aiming to improve the reliability and integrity of AI-mediated information dissemination. |
Low | GrooveSquid.com (original content) | Low Difficulty Summary This study looks at how well language models like GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 get facts right, stay consistent, and avoid being unfair or biased. This is important because we rely on these models for online information a lot, and we want to make sure they’re giving us trustworthy answers. |
Keywords
» Artificial intelligence » Gpt