Loading Now

Summary of Datta: Towards Diversity Adaptive Test-time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild World, by Chuyang Ye et al.


DATTA: Towards Diversity Adaptive Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild World

by Chuyang Ye, Dongyan Wei, Zhendong Liu, Yuanyi Pang, Yixi Lin, Jiarong Liao, Qinting Jiang, Xianghua Fu, Qing Li, Jingyan Jiang

First submitted to arxiv on: 15 Aug 2024

Categories

  • Main: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
  • Secondary: None

     Abstract of paper      PDF of paper


GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries

GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!

Summary difficulty Written by Summary
High Paper authors High Difficulty Summary
Read the original abstract here
Medium GrooveSquid.com (original content) Medium Difficulty Summary
The proposed Diversity Adaptive Test-Time Adaptation (DATTA) method aims to improve the Quality of Experience (QoE) by dynamically selecting the best batch normalization methods and fine-tuning strategies based on the Diversity Score. The approach features three key components: Diversity Discrimination (DD) to assess batch diversity, Diversity Adaptive Batch Normalization (DABN) to tailor normalization methods, and Diversity Adaptive Fine-Tuning (DAFT) to selectively fine-tune the model.
Low GrooveSquid.com (original content) Low Difficulty Summary
This method is designed to address distribution shifts between training and testing data by adjusting models on test samples. The paper proposes a new general approach that dynamically selects the best batch normalization methods and fine-tuning strategies based on the Diversity Score, which differentiates between high and low diversity score batches. This results in up to a 21% increase in accuracy compared to state-of-the-art methodologies.

Keywords

» Artificial intelligence  » Batch normalization  » Fine tuning