Loading Now

Summary of Advancing Legal Reasoning: the Integration Of Ai to Navigate Complexities and Biases in Global Jurisprudence with Semi-automated Arbitration Processes (saaps), by Michael De’shazer


by Michael De’Shazer

First submitted to arxiv on: 6 Feb 2024

Categories

  • Main: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
  • Secondary: Computers and Society (cs.CY); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)

     Abstract of paper      PDF of paper


GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries

GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!

Summary difficulty Written by Summary
High Paper authors High Difficulty Summary
Read the original abstract here
Medium GrooveSquid.com (original content) Medium Difficulty Summary
This paper presents a novel approach to analyzing court judgments from five countries, leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) to identify biases and facilitate coherent argumentation. The authors develop an AI-based application called SHIRLEY, which detects logical inconsistencies and biases across legal decisions. To validate SHIRLEY’s results, the researchers introduce SAM, another AI-based application that identifies relative deviations in bias detections. Additionally, a CRITIC is generated within a semi-autonomous arbitration process via SARA, an ALM. The paper proposes a hybrid system of AI and human-based collaborative analysis to ensure the integrity and fairness of legal judgments. By incorporating Advanced Language Models (ALMs) and a human-AI collaborative framework, this study aims to improve the consistency of law application across jurisdictions.
Low GrooveSquid.com (original content) Low Difficulty Summary
This research uses artificial intelligence (AI) to analyze court decisions from different countries. The goal is to find biases in these decisions and make sure they are fair. The authors created a new AI tool called SHIRLEY, which helps detect problems with the decisions. To check if SHIRLEY’s results are accurate, they also used another AI tool called SAM. Additionally, they developed an arbitration process that combines human and AI analysis to ensure fairness in legal judgments.

Keywords

» Artificial intelligence  » Sam