Summary of A Data-centric Approach For Assessing Progress Of Graph Neural Networks, by Tianqi Zhao et al.
A data-centric approach for assessing progress of Graph Neural Networks
by Tianqi Zhao, Ngan Thi Dong, Alan Hanjalic, Megha Khosla
First submitted to arxiv on: 18 Jun 2024
Categories
- Main: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
- Secondary: None
GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries
GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!
| Summary difficulty | Written by | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| High | Paper authors | High Difficulty Summary Read the original abstract here |
| Medium | GrooveSquid.com (original content) | Medium Difficulty Summary The abstract describes a study on multi-label node classification using Graph Neural Networks (GNNs). The authors note that most improvements in GNNs are focused on multi-class classification, whereas multi-label node classification is less explored. To address this, they collected and released three biological datasets, developed a multi-label graph generator with tunable properties, and defined new notions of homophily and Cross-Class Neighborhood Similarity for multi-label classification. The authors also conducted a large-scale comparative study across nine datasets to evaluate current progress in multi-label node classification. The study uses 9 collected multi-label datasets and compares 8 methods. |
| Low | GrooveSquid.com (original content) | Low Difficulty Summary This research paper is about using special kinds of artificial intelligence called Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) for classifying nodes in networks that have multiple labels. Right now, most people are focusing on GNNs for simple classification tasks, but this study looks at how well they do when each node can have many different labels. To help with this research, the authors collected three real-world datasets and created a special tool to generate new multi-label graphs. They also came up with some new ideas about what makes nodes similar or different in these networks. Finally, they compared 8 different methods for doing this type of classification on 9 different datasets. |
Keywords
» Artificial intelligence » Classification
