Loading Now

Summary of A Correction Of Pseudo Log-likelihood Method, by Shi Feng et al.


A Correction of Pseudo Log-Likelihood Method

by Shi Feng, Nuoya Xiong, Zhijie Zhang, Wei Chen

First submitted to arxiv on: 26 Mar 2024

Categories

  • Main: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
  • Secondary: Statistics Theory (math.ST); Machine Learning (stat.ML)

     Abstract of paper      PDF of paper


GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries

GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!

Summary difficulty Written by Summary
High Paper authors High Difficulty Summary
Read the original abstract here
Medium GrooveSquid.com (original content) Medium Difficulty Summary
This paper tackles a crucial issue in maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) methods used in contextual bandits, influence maximization of social networks, and causal bandits. Specifically, it addresses the problem of unbounded log-likelihood functions, which can lead to poorly defined algorithms. The authors provide a counterexample demonstrating the failure of pseudo log-likelihood estimation and propose a solution to rectify existing algorithms.
Low GrooveSquid.com (original content) Low Difficulty Summary
This paper fixes a big problem in how we estimate things called maximum likelihood estimations (MLEs). These MLEs are used in some really cool areas like getting the best actions in different situations, making social networks grow faster, and understanding cause-and-effect. The trouble is that sometimes these MLEs don’t work well because the math behind them isn’t complete. In this paper, the authors show what can go wrong and then give a way to make it better.

Keywords

* Artificial intelligence  * Likelihood  * Log likelihood