Loading Now

Summary of Exploring Response Uncertainty in Mllms: An Empirical Evaluation Under Misleading Scenarios, by Yunkai Dang et al.


Exploring Response Uncertainty in MLLMs: An Empirical Evaluation under Misleading Scenarios

by Yunkai Dang, Mengxi Gao, Yibo Yan, Xin Zou, Yanggan Gu, Aiwei Liu, Xuming Hu

First submitted to arxiv on: 5 Nov 2024

Categories

  • Main: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
  • Secondary: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

     Abstract of paper      PDF of paper


GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries

GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!

Summary difficulty Written by Summary
High Paper authors High Difficulty Summary
Read the original abstract here
Medium GrooveSquid.com (original content) Medium Difficulty Summary
The proposed pipeline for ensuring consistency in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) involves collecting responses without misleading information and then gathering misleading ones via specific instructions. The model’s response uncertainty is measured by calculating the misleading rate, capturing shifts between correct-to-incorrect and incorrect-to-correct responses. This leads to the establishment of a Multimodal Uncertainty Benchmark (MUB) that assesses MLLMs’ vulnerability across domains using explicit and implicit misleading instructions.
Low GrooveSquid.com (original content) Low Difficulty Summary
All MLLMs are highly susceptible to misleading instructions, with an average rate exceeding 86%. To enhance robustness, open-source MLLMs were fine-tuned by incorporating explicit and implicit misleading data, reducing the misleading rates significantly. The study’s code is available on GitHub.

Keywords

* Artificial intelligence