Loading Now

Summary of Putting Data at the Centre Of Offline Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning, by Claude Formanek et al.


Putting Data at the Centre of Offline Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

by Claude Formanek, Louise Beyers, Callum Rhys Tilbury, Jonathan P. Shock, Arnu Pretorius

First submitted to arxiv on: 18 Sep 2024

Categories

  • Main: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
  • Secondary: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)

     Abstract of paper      PDF of paper


GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries

GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!

Summary difficulty Written by Summary
High Paper authors High Difficulty Summary
Read the original abstract here
Medium GrooveSquid.com (original content) Medium Difficulty Summary
The paper presents a comprehensive approach to improve data usage and awareness in offline multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL). It highlights the importance of considering dataset characteristics in achieving state-of-the-art results. The authors survey the literature, revealing that most works generate their own datasets without consistent methodology, leading to sparse information about these datasets. They argue that neglecting dataset nature is problematic, as algorithmic performance is tightly coupled to the used dataset. To address this issue, they provide a clear guideline for generating novel datasets, standardize over 80 existing datasets in a publicly available repository, and develop analysis tools to better understand these datasets.
Low GrooveSquid.com (original content) Low Difficulty Summary
Offline MARL uses static datasets to find optimal control policies for multi-agent systems. The paper shows how most works generate their own datasets without consistent methodology, providing little information about dataset characteristics. This is problematic because algorithmic performance is closely tied to the used dataset. To fix this, the authors provide guidelines for generating new datasets, standardize 80+ existing datasets in a public repository, and create analysis tools to better understand these datasets.

Keywords

* Artificial intelligence  * Reinforcement learning