Loading Now

Summary of Bias in Llms As Annotators: the Effect Of Party Cues on Labelling Decision by Large Language Models, By Sebastian Vallejo Vera and Hunter Driggers


Bias in LLMs as Annotators: The Effect of Party Cues on Labelling Decision by Large Language Models

by Sebastian Vallejo Vera, Hunter Driggers

First submitted to arxiv on: 28 Aug 2024

Categories

  • Main: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
  • Secondary: Machine Learning (cs.LG)

     Abstract of paper      PDF of paper


GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries

GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!

Summary difficulty Written by Summary
High Paper authors High Difficulty Summary
Read the original abstract here
Medium GrooveSquid.com (original content) Medium Difficulty Summary
As machine learning educators write for a technical audience not specialized in this subfield, we find that Large Language Models (LLMs) replicate human biases as annotators. By replicating an experiment from Ennser-Jedenastik and Meyer (2018), our findings show LLMs use political information to contextualize whether statements are positive, negative, or neutral based on party cues. Furthermore, we observe that LLMs reflect the biases of their human-generated training data, unlike humans who only exhibit bias when faced with extreme parties. The implications of these results are discussed in the conclusion.
Low GrooveSquid.com (original content) Low Difficulty Summary
Large Language Models (LLMs) can be biased too! Just like humans, they can use political information to decide if something is good or bad. But here’s the thing: LLMs don’t just use that info when it comes from super extreme parties. They’re biased even when the statements are from more moderate parties. This matters because we want AI systems to be fair and not pick favorites.

Keywords

* Artificial intelligence  * Machine learning