Summary of How Close Is Chatgpt to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detection, by Biyang Guo et al.
How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detection
by Biyang Guo, Xin Zhang, Ziyuan Wang, Minqi Jiang, Jinran Nie, Yuxuan Ding, Jianwei Yue, Yupeng Wu
First submitted to arxiv on: 18 Jan 2023
Categories
- Main: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
- Secondary: None
GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries
GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!
| Summary difficulty | Written by | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| High | Paper authors | High Difficulty Summary Read the original abstract here |
| Medium | GrooveSquid.com (original content) | Medium Difficulty Summary The introduction of ChatGPT has sparked widespread interest in its capabilities and potential implications. This paper delves into the strengths and limitations of ChatGPT, analyzing tens of thousands of comparison responses from human experts and the AI model across various domains, including finance, medicine, law, and psychology. The Human ChatGPT Comparison Corpus (HC3) dataset is introduced, providing a comprehensive platform for studying ChatGPT’s characteristics, differences with human experts, and future directions for large language models (LLMs). The paper also presents an in-depth analysis of the linguistic features and detection systems for identifying ChatGPT-generated content. With publicly available code, models, and datasets, this research contributes to the ongoing discussion on the potential benefits and challenges of LLMs like ChatGPT. |
| Low | GrooveSquid.com (original content) | Low Difficulty Summary This study looks at how well a new AI model called ChatGPT can answer questions and provide information compared to humans. People are curious about how good ChatGPT is and what it might mean for society. The researchers collected many examples of ChatGPT’s answers and compared them to those from human experts in different areas, like finance and medicine. They found some interesting things about how ChatGPT works and where it falls short compared to humans. The study also explores ways to figure out whether a piece of text was written by ChatGPT or a human. All the data, code, and models used in the research are available for anyone to use. |
