Loading Now

Summary of Advancing Financial Risk Prediction Through Optimized Lstm Model Performance and Comparative Analysis, by Ke Xu et al.


Advancing Financial Risk Prediction Through Optimized LSTM Model Performance and Comparative Analysis

by Ke Xu, Yu Cheng, Shiqing Long, Junjie Guo, Jue Xiao, Mengfang Sun

First submitted to arxiv on: 31 May 2024

Categories

  • Main: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
  • Secondary: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

     Abstract of paper      PDF of paper


GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries

GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!

Summary difficulty Written by Summary
High Paper authors High Difficulty Summary
Read the original abstract here
Medium GrooveSquid.com (original content) Medium Difficulty Summary
The proposed LSTM-based approach optimizes the performance of financial risk prediction by leveraging Long Short-Term Memory models. The study begins by reviewing the architecture and algorithmic foundations of LSTMs before detailing the training process and hyperparameter tuning strategy. Experimental adjustments are made to network parameters, resulting in improved performance. Comparative experiments demonstrate the optimized LSTM model’s significant advantages over random forest, BP neural networks, and XGBoost in terms of AUC index, validating its efficiency and practicality in financial risk prediction, particularly with complex time series data.
Low GrooveSquid.com (original content) Low Difficulty Summary
This research uses a type of AI called LSTMs to predict risks in finance. It starts by explaining what LSTMs are and how they work, then shows how the model is trained and adjusted for better results. The study compares its approach to other methods and finds that it performs well, especially with complex data.

Keywords

» Artificial intelligence  » Auc  » Hyperparameter  » Lstm  » Random forest  » Time series  » Xgboost