Loading Now

Summary of A Systems Thinking Approach to Algorithmic Fairness, by Chris Lam


A Systems Thinking Approach to Algorithmic Fairness

by Chris Lam

First submitted to arxiv on: 21 Dec 2024

Categories

  • Main: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
  • Secondary: Computers and Society (cs.CY)

     Abstract of paper      PDF of paper


GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries

GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!

Summary difficulty Written by Summary
High Paper authors High Difficulty Summary
Read the original abstract here
Medium GrooveSquid.com (original content) Medium Difficulty Summary
This paper applies systems thinking to model algorithmic fairness by encoding prior knowledge about potential bias in data. The authors use causal graphs to link AI/ML systems to politics and law, combining techniques from machine learning, causal inference, and system dynamics. This enables capturing different emergent aspects of the fairness problem. The approach helps policymakers understand complex trade-offs between fairness policies, providing a sociotechnical foundation for designing AI policy aligned with political agendas and societal values.
Low GrooveSquid.com (original content) Low Difficulty Summary
This paper is about making sure artificial intelligence (AI) systems are fair and don’t discriminate against certain groups of people. The authors use a special way of thinking called “systems thinking” to figure out where bias might exist in the data that trains AI systems. They then use this information to design fairness policies that take into account different political views and societal values.

Keywords

» Artificial intelligence  » Inference  » Machine learning