Loading Now

Summary of Explore the Reasoning Capability Of Llms in the Chess Testbed, by Shu Wang et al.


Explore the Reasoning Capability of LLMs in the Chess Testbed

by Shu Wang, Lei Ji, Renxi Wang, Wenxiao Zhao, Haokun Liu, Yifan Hou, Ying Nian Wu

First submitted to arxiv on: 11 Nov 2024

Categories

  • Main: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
  • Secondary: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

     Abstract of paper      PDF of paper


GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries

GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!

Summary difficulty Written by Summary
High Paper authors High Difficulty Summary
Read the original abstract here
Medium GrooveSquid.com (original content) Medium Difficulty Summary
The proposed method improves the reasoning capabilities of large language models in playing chess by integrating annotated strategy and tactics. The approach involves finetuning a model with a dataset containing 1 million chess positions, each with candidate moves annotated by chess experts. This approach outperforms state-of-the-art commercial language models such as GPT, Claude, and Gemini in selecting better chess moves. The addition of language explanations enhances the reasoning capability of large language models.
Low GrooveSquid.com (original content) Low Difficulty Summary
Large language models are getting better at playing chess! Researchers noticed that expert chess players use a mix of long-term strategies and short-term tactics to win games. They created a special dataset with 1 million chess positions, each with suggested moves from experts. By training a model on this data, they made it better at choosing good moves than other top models. Adding explanations for why the moves were chosen also helped the model make even better choices.

Keywords

» Artificial intelligence  » Claude  » Gemini  » Gpt