Loading Now

Summary of Holistic Automated Red Teaming For Large Language Models Through Top-down Test Case Generation and Multi-turn Interaction, by Jinchuan Zhang et al.


Holistic Automated Red Teaming for Large Language Models through Top-Down Test Case Generation and Multi-turn Interaction

by Jinchuan Zhang, Yan Zhou, Yaxin Liu, Ziming Li, Songlin Hu

First submitted to arxiv on: 25 Sep 2024

Categories

  • Main: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
  • Secondary: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)

     Abstract of paper      PDF of paper


GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries

GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!

Summary difficulty Written by Summary
High Paper authors High Difficulty Summary
Read the original abstract here
Medium GrooveSquid.com (original content) Medium Difficulty Summary
A new approach, HARM (Holistic Automated Red teaMing), is proposed to improve automated red teaming for large language models (LLMs). The existing methods focus on improving attack success rates but neglect comprehensive test case coverage. HARM scales up diversity using a top-down risk taxonomy and fine-tuning strategy, enabling multi-turn adversarial probing like humans. Experimental results show that HARM provides a systematic understanding of model vulnerabilities and targeted guidance for the alignment process.
Low GrooveSquid.com (original content) Low Difficulty Summary
Automated red teaming helps identify misaligned behaviors in large language models (LLMs). Existing methods focus on improving attacks, but overlook test case coverage. A new method, HARM, is proposed to overcome these limitations. It uses a risk taxonomy and fine-tuning strategy to create diverse test cases and simulate human-like interactions. This makes it easier to understand model weaknesses and improve how well models work with humans.

Keywords

» Artificial intelligence  » Alignment  » Fine tuning