Loading Now

Summary of Hierarchical Blockmodelling For Knowledge Graphs, by Marcin Pietrasik and Marek Reformat and Anna Wilbik


Hierarchical Blockmodelling for Knowledge Graphs

by Marcin Pietrasik, Marek Reformat, Anna Wilbik

First submitted to arxiv on: 28 Aug 2024

Categories

  • Main: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
  • Secondary: None

     Abstract of paper      PDF of paper


GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries

GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!

Summary difficulty Written by Summary
High Paper authors High Difficulty Summary
Read the original abstract here
Medium GrooveSquid.com (original content) Medium Difficulty Summary
This paper investigates the use of probabilistic graphical models, specifically stochastic blockmodels, for hierarchical entity clustering on knowledge graphs. The authors propose a novel model that integrates the Nested Chinese Restaurant Process and the Stick Breaking Process into a generative model, allowing for the induction of hierarchical clusterings without prior constraints. They derive a collapsed Gibbs sampling scheme for inference and evaluate their model on synthetic and real-world datasets, comparing it to benchmark models. The results show that the model is capable of inducing coherent cluster hierarchies in small-scale settings. This work provides a foundation for further applications of stochastic blockmodels for knowledge graphs at larger scales.
Low GrooveSquid.com (original content) Low Difficulty Summary
This paper uses special math models to group similar things together on big databases called knowledge graphs. It’s like finding groups of friends who have something in common, but instead of friends, it’s websites and pieces of information. The authors came up with a new way to do this that works well for small sets of data. They tested their method on real and fake data and compared it to other methods. Their results show that their method can find good groupings, which is important for understanding how the data is connected.

Keywords

» Artificial intelligence  » Clustering  » Generative model  » Inference