Loading Now

Summary of The Challenges Of Evaluating Llm Applications: An Analysis Of Automated, Human, and Llm-based Approaches, by Bhashithe Abeysinghe and Ruhan Circi


The Challenges of Evaluating LLM Applications: An Analysis of Automated, Human, and LLM-Based Approaches

by Bhashithe Abeysinghe, Ruhan Circi

First submitted to arxiv on: 5 Jun 2024

Categories

  • Main: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
  • Secondary: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

     Abstract of paper      PDF of paper


GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries

GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!

Summary difficulty Written by Summary
High Paper authors High Difficulty Summary
Read the original abstract here
Medium GrooveSquid.com (original content) Medium Difficulty Summary
The paper explores the evaluation of chatbot responses, specifically focusing on transformer-based generative AI methods. The natural language generation community lacks a consensus on effective evaluation approaches, which hampers the development and improvement of chatbots. This study discusses the limitations of LLM (Large Language Model)-based evaluations and proposes a comprehensive factored evaluation mechanism that combines human and LLM-based assessments. An experimental evaluation is conducted to compare traditional human evaluation with automated and factored LLM and human evaluations, revealing that factor-based evaluation provides better insights on which aspects require improvement in LLM applications.
Low GrooveSquid.com (original content) Low Difficulty Summary
Chatbots are AI-powered tools that can have many uses, like helping people communicate or provide information. Right now, there’s a problem figuring out how well chatbot responses are doing. Some experts think using computers to evaluate the responses is okay, but others don’t agree. This paper looks at how we can do better evaluations and introduces a new way to compare how humans and computer programs assess chatbot responses. The results show that this new approach helps us understand which parts of the chatbots need improvement.

Keywords

» Artificial intelligence  » Large language model  » Transformer