Summary of Agentharm: a Benchmark For Measuring Harmfulness Of Llm Agents, by Maksym Andriushchenko et al.
AgentHarm: A Benchmark for Measuring Harmfulness of LLM Agents
by Maksym Andriushchenko, Alexandra Souly, Mateusz Dziemian, Derek Duenas, Maxwell Lin, Justin Wang, Dan Hendrycks, Andy Zou, Zico Kolter, Matt Fredrikson, Eric Winsor, Jerome Wynne, Yarin Gal, Xander Davies
First submitted to arxiv on: 11 Oct 2024
Categories
- Main: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
- Secondary: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries
GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!
| Summary difficulty | Written by | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| High | Paper authors | High Difficulty Summary Read the original abstract here |
| Medium | GrooveSquid.com (original content) | Medium Difficulty Summary The proposed benchmark, AgentHarm, aims to facilitate research on the robustness of Large Language Models (LLMs) against jailbreak attacks. This is particularly important for LLM agents that can execute multi-stage tasks and potentially pose a greater risk if misused. The benchmark includes 110 explicitly malicious agent tasks, covering 11 harm categories such as fraud, cybercrime, and harassment. To evaluate the effectiveness of these attacks, researchers need to measure whether models refuse harmful agentic requests while maintaining their capabilities following an attack. This is crucial for developing defenses against LLM-based agents. The study finds that leading LLMs are surprisingly compliant with malicious agent requests without jailbreaking, making it possible to effectively adapt simple universal templates to jailbreak agents. These jailbreaks enable coherent and malicious multi-step agent behavior while retaining model capabilities. |
| Low | GrooveSquid.com (original content) | Low Difficulty Summary Large Language Models (LLMs) can be used for good or bad. This paper is about making sure LLMs don’t do harm when they’re misused. Imagine someone designing a special prompt to trick an AI chatbot into doing something mean or illegal. That’s called a “jailbreak attack.” This paper looks at how well some popular AIs can resist these kinds of attacks, especially for more powerful AIs that can do many things together. The researchers created a test with 110 different tasks that could be used to harm people or the environment. They found that most of the AIs were very good at doing what they were told, even when it was bad. This makes it important to create defenses against these kinds of attacks. |
Keywords
» Artificial intelligence » Prompt
