Loading Now

Summary of Opendebateevidence: a Massive-scale Argument Mining and Summarization Dataset, by Allen Roush et al.


OpenDebateEvidence: A Massive-Scale Argument Mining and Summarization Dataset

by Allen Roush, Yusuf Shabazz, Arvind Balaji, Peter Zhang, Stefano Mezza, Markus Zhang, Sanjay Basu, Sriram Vishwanath, Mehdi Fatemi, Ravid Shwartz-Ziv

First submitted to arxiv on: 20 Jun 2024

Categories

  • Main: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
  • Secondary: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

     Abstract of paper      PDF of paper


GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries

GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!

Summary difficulty Written by Summary
High Paper authors High Difficulty Summary
Read the original abstract here
Medium GrooveSquid.com (original content) Medium Difficulty Summary
This paper introduces OpenDebateEvidence, a comprehensive dataset for argument mining and summarization sourced from the American Competitive Debate community. The dataset includes over 3.5 million documents with rich metadata, making it one of the most extensive collections of debate evidence. State-of-the-art large language models can be fine-tuned to perform argumentative abstractive summarization across various methods, models, and datasets. The authors aim to advance computational argumentation and support practical applications for debaters, educators, and researchers.
Low GrooveSquid.com (original content) Low Difficulty Summary
This paper creates a huge dataset for studying debates. It’s like a big library of arguments from high school and college debates. This will help computers learn to summarize debates better. People who study debate or teach it can use this data to make their work easier. The goal is to make computers understand debates better so people can use them to improve debating.

Keywords

» Artificial intelligence  » Summarization