Summary of Chain Of Preference Optimization: Improving Chain-of-thought Reasoning in Llms, by Xuan Zhang et al.
Chain of Preference Optimization: Improving Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in LLMs
by Xuan Zhang, Chao Du, Tianyu Pang, Qian Liu, Wei Gao, Min Lin
First submitted to arxiv on: 13 Jun 2024
Categories
- Main: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
- Secondary: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries
GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!
Summary difficulty | Written by | Summary |
---|---|---|
High | Paper authors | High Difficulty Summary Read the original abstract here |
Medium | GrooveSquid.com (original content) | Medium Difficulty Summary In this research paper, the authors introduce Chain of Preference Optimization (CPO), a fine-tuning method for large language models (LLMs) that leverages the tree-of-thought (ToT) method to achieve better performance in solving complex problems. CPO is designed to align each step of the chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning paths with those of ToT using preference information from the tree-search process. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of CPO by applying it to various tasks, including question answering, fact verification, and arithmetic reasoning, achieving significant improvements in LLM performance. |
Low | GrooveSquid.com (original content) | Low Difficulty Summary Large language models can generate logical reasoning paths for complex problem-solving thanks to chain-of-thought (CoT) decoding. However, these paths are not always deliberate or optimal. The tree-of-thought (ToT) method is designed to find better reasoning paths by exploring the reasoning space. But this deliberation comes at a cost: increased inference complexity. This research shows that fine-tuning LLMs using ToT can help CoT achieve similar results without the extra processing required. |
Keywords
» Artificial intelligence » Fine tuning » Inference » Optimization » Question answering