Loading Now

Summary of Estimating the Hallucination Rate Of Generative Ai, by Andrew Jesson and Nicolas Beltran-velez and Quentin Chu and Sweta Karlekar and Jannik Kossen and Yarin Gal and John P. Cunningham and David Blei


Estimating the Hallucination Rate of Generative AI

by Andrew Jesson, Nicolas Beltran-Velez, Quentin Chu, Sweta Karlekar, Jannik Kossen, Yarin Gal, John P. Cunningham, David Blei

First submitted to arxiv on: 11 Jun 2024

Categories

  • Main: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
  • Secondary: Machine Learning (stat.ML)

     Abstract of paper      PDF of paper


GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries

GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!

Summary difficulty Written by Summary
High Paper authors High Difficulty Summary
Read the original abstract here
Medium GrooveSquid.com (original content) Medium Difficulty Summary
The paper proposes a method to estimate the hallucination rate in context learning (ICL) with generative AI, which involves prompting a conditional generative model (CGM) to generate responses. The authors define hallucinations as generated responses with low likelihood given the mechanism. They develop an estimation method that only requires generating prediction questions and responses from the CGM and evaluating its response log probability. This method is evaluated using large language models for synthetic regression and natural language ICL tasks.
Low GrooveSquid.com (original content) Low Difficulty Summary
This paper introduces a way to measure how often generative AI makes mistakes when trying to answer questions based on what it has learned. The authors believe that this is important because AI might not always understand the question or the task, even if it looks like it does. They came up with a new method to figure out how likely an AI model is to make these kinds of mistakes.

Keywords

» Artificial intelligence  » Generative model  » Hallucination  » Likelihood  » Probability  » Prompting  » Regression