Loading Now

Summary of Evaluating Text Summaries Generated by Large Language Models Using Openai’s Gpt, By Hassan Shakil et al.


Evaluating Text Summaries Generated by Large Language Models Using OpenAI’s GPT

by Hassan Shakil, Atqiya Munawara Mahi, Phuoc Nguyen, Zeydy Ortiz, Mamoun T. Mardini

First submitted to arxiv on: 7 May 2024

Categories

  • Main: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
  • Secondary: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

     Abstract of paper      PDF of paper


GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries

GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!

Summary difficulty Written by Summary
High Paper authors High Difficulty Summary
Read the original abstract here
Medium GrooveSquid.com (original content) Medium Difficulty Summary
The research investigates the performance of OpenAI’s GPT models as independent evaluators of text summaries generated by six transformer-based models from Hugging Face. The study focuses on evaluating these summaries based on essential properties such as conciseness, relevance, coherence, and readability using traditional metrics like ROUGE and Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA). The results show significant correlations between GPT evaluations and traditional metrics, particularly in assessing relevance and coherence. This demonstrates the potential of GPT as a robust tool for evaluating text summaries, offering insights that complement established metrics.
Low GrooveSquid.com (original content) Low Difficulty Summary
This research uses special computer models to test how good other computer models are at summarizing texts. They used six different models to create summaries, and then tested those summaries using another model called GPT. GPT looked at the summaries and gave its own opinion on how good they were. The results showed that what GPT thought was important in a summary matched what experts usually look for. This is useful because it means we can use GPT to help figure out which models are best at summarizing texts.

Keywords

» Artificial intelligence  » Gpt  » Rouge  » Transformer