Loading Now

Summary of Ii-bench: An Image Implication Understanding Benchmark For Multimodal Large Language Models, by Ziqiang Liu et al.


II-Bench: An Image Implication Understanding Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models

by Ziqiang Liu, Feiteng Fang, Xi Feng, Xinrun Du, Chenhao Zhang, Zekun Wang, Yuelin Bai, Qixuan Zhao, Liyang Fan, Chengguang Gan, Hongquan Lin, Jiaming Li, Yuansheng Ni, Haihong Wu, Yaswanth Narsupalli, Zhigang Zheng, Chengming Li, Xiping Hu, Ruifeng Xu, Xiaojun Chen, Min Yang, Jiaheng Liu, Ruibo Liu, Wenhao Huang, Ge Zhang, Shiwen Ni

First submitted to arxiv on: 9 Jun 2024

Categories

  • Main: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
  • Secondary: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

     Abstract of paper      PDF of paper


GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries

GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!

Summary difficulty Written by Summary
High Paper authors High Difficulty Summary
Read the original abstract here
Medium GrooveSquid.com (original content) Medium Difficulty Summary
The rapid advancements in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have led to new breakthroughs on various benchmarks. However, there is a lack of exploration into the higher-order perceptual capabilities of MLLMs. To address this gap, the Image Implication understanding Benchmark (II-Bench) evaluates the model’s higher-order perception of images. Through experiments, significant findings are made. Initially, a performance gap is observed between MLLMs and humans on II-Bench. The pinnacle accuracy of MLLMs reaches 74.8%, while human accuracy averages 90% with a peak of 98%. Subsequently, MLLMs perform worse on abstract and complex images, suggesting limitations in their ability to understand high-level semantics and capture image details. Incorporating image sentiment polarity hints into prompts also enhances model accuracy, underscoring a deficiency in their inherent understanding of image sentiment.
Low GrooveSquid.com (original content) Low Difficulty Summary
This paper proposes the Image Implication understanding Benchmark (II-Bench) to evaluate the higher-order perception capabilities of multimodal large language models (MLLMs). The benchmark aims to bridge the gap between MLLMs and humans’ abilities. The paper presents findings from extensive experiments on II-Bench across multiple MLLMs, revealing a performance gap between machines and humans. MLLMs struggle with understanding abstract and complex images, suggesting limitations in their ability to capture high-level semantics. Additionally, incorporating image sentiment polarity hints improves model accuracy.

Keywords

» Artificial intelligence  » Semantics