Summary of Your Device May Know You Better Than You Know Yourself — Continuous Authentication on Novel Dataset Using Machine Learning, by Pedro Gomes Do Nascimento et al.
Your device may know you better than you know yourself – continuous authentication on novel dataset using machine learning
by Pedro Gomes do Nascimento, Pidge Witiak, Tucker MacCallum, Zachary Winterfeldt, Rushit Dave
First submitted to arxiv on: 6 Mar 2024
Categories
- Main: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
- Secondary: None
GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries
GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!
Summary difficulty | Written by | Summary |
---|---|---|
High | Paper authors | High Difficulty Summary Read the original abstract here |
Medium | GrooveSquid.com (original content) | Medium Difficulty Summary The paper presents a novel dataset and machine learning models for continuous authentication using behavioral biometrics. The dataset consists of gesture data from 15 users playing Minecraft on a Samsung Tablet for 15 minutes each. The authors employed three machine learning binary classifiers – Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Support Vector Classifier (SVC) – to determine the authenticity of specific user actions. The most robust model was SVC, achieving an average accuracy of approximately 90%, demonstrating the effectiveness of touch dynamics in distinguishing users. However, further studies are needed to make it a viable option for authentication systems. |
Low | GrooveSquid.com (original content) | Low Difficulty Summary The paper creates a new dataset and uses machine learning models to see if people can be identified by how they play Minecraft on a tablet. They collected data from 15 people playing for 15 minutes each. Then, they used three different computer programs – Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors, and Support Vector Classifier – to try to figure out who was doing what. The best one worked about 90% of the time! It looks like how we touch things on a screen can be used to tell us apart. But more work needs to be done before this can be used in real-life systems. |
Keywords
» Artificial intelligence » Machine learning » Random forest