Loading Now

Summary of Abdelhak at Semeval-2024 Task 9 : Decoding Brainteasers, the Efficacy Of Dedicated Models Versus Chatgpt, by Abdelhak Kelious et al.


Abdelhak at SemEval-2024 Task 9 : Decoding Brainteasers, The Efficacy of Dedicated Models Versus ChatGPT

by Abdelhak Kelious, Mounir Okirim

First submitted to arxiv on: 24 Feb 2024

Categories

  • Main: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
  • Secondary: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

     Abstract of paper      PDF of paper


GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries

GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!

Summary difficulty Written by Summary
High Paper authors High Difficulty Summary
Read the original abstract here
Medium GrooveSquid.com (original content) Medium Difficulty Summary
This study presents a bespoke machine learning model designed for solving the BRAINTEASER task 9, which evaluates lateral thinking capabilities through sentence and word puzzles. The introduced model achieves impressive results, ranking first in sentence puzzle resolution with an overall score of 0.98 during the test phase. Furthermore, this research investigates the performance variation of ChatGPT by analyzing how temperature settings influence its capacity for lateral thinking and problem-solving. Notably, the study reveals a significant performance gap between the dedicated model and ChatGPT, highlighting the potential benefits of specialized approaches in enhancing creative reasoning in AI.
Low GrooveSquid.com (original content) Low Difficulty Summary
This paper introduces a new way to test artificial intelligence’s ability to think creatively. It creates a special puzzle that requires lateral thinking to solve. The researchers made a custom AI model specifically for this task and it does incredibly well, solving puzzles better than any other model tested. They also looked at how a popular existing AI model, ChatGPT, performs on the same task when its settings are changed. Surprisingly, the new model is much better at solving these puzzles than ChatGPT, showing that making an AI specifically for creative thinking can really help it excel.

Keywords

» Artificial intelligence  » Machine learning  » Temperature