Loading Now

Summary of A Closer Look at the Limitations Of Instruction Tuning, by Sreyan Ghosh and Chandra Kiran Reddy Evuru and Sonal Kumar and Ramaneswaran S and Deepali Aneja and Zeyu Jin and Ramani Duraiswami and Dinesh Manocha


A Closer Look at the Limitations of Instruction Tuning

by Sreyan Ghosh, Chandra Kiran Reddy Evuru, Sonal Kumar, Ramaneswaran S, Deepali Aneja, Zeyu Jin, Ramani Duraiswami, Dinesh Manocha

First submitted to arxiv on: 3 Feb 2024

Categories

  • Main: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
  • Secondary: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

     Abstract of paper      PDF of paper


GrooveSquid.com Paper Summaries

GrooveSquid.com’s goal is to make artificial intelligence research accessible by summarizing AI papers in simpler terms. Each summary below covers the same AI paper, written at different levels of difficulty. The medium difficulty and low difficulty versions are original summaries written by GrooveSquid.com, while the high difficulty version is the paper’s original abstract. Feel free to learn from the version that suits you best!

Summary difficulty Written by Summary
High Paper authors High Difficulty Summary
Read the original abstract here
Medium GrooveSquid.com (original content) Medium Difficulty Summary
This research paper investigates the limitations of Instruction Tuning (IT), a widely used method for transforming large language models into conversational agents. The study reveals that IT fails to enhance knowledge or skills in these models, instead leading to degradation or copying response patterns from limited datasets. Moreover, popular methods to improve IT do not yield performance gains over simple fine-tuning approaches. The findings suggest that responses generated solely from pre-trained knowledge outperform those learned through IT on open-source datasets.
Low GrooveSquid.com (original content) Low Difficulty Summary
IT is a technique for training large language models using instruction-response pairs. While it has achieved success and widespread adoption, its limitations remain unexplored. This paper reveals the shortcomings of IT by analyzing changes in language models through this process. The study shows that IT fails to enhance knowledge or skills, copying response patterns from datasets, leading to decreased quality, and increasing hallucinations by borrowing tokens from conceptually similar instances.

Keywords

» Artificial intelligence  » Fine tuning  » Instruction tuning